May 04, 2005
WAR CRIMES TRIBUNAL FOR US ARMY BULLY
The UN will bring war crimes charges against a US
Army
interpreter who
admits he punched Saddam Hussein in the mouth when the mass
murderer was captured. "You can't just go around hitting people," a
spokesman said. The interpreter could also be
charged with Hate Crimes since he called Hussein a motherf*cker,
an SOB, a rat, a bastard, & spit on him.
UN spokesman: "We will not tolerate spitting."
Originally from Nasiriyah, the interpreter was miffed that Hussein slaughtered thousands of his fellow Shias, & told Hussein he was going to "f*ck him in the ass," so could also be charged with sexual harassment. A UN spokesman, swamped with sex crimes allegations against UN peacekeepers, said "He was a head of state, not some piece of gash."
The tribunal will be convened in the Hague, where the smash-hit war crimes tribunal of Slobodan Milosevic has been running for 3 years & become a cottage industry. "Let's face it," says an insider, "except for war crimes trials, European industry is in the crapper. We're hoping to corner the tribunal market with incentives & gift baskets."
It's hoped more tribunals could ease unemployment & become a tourist magnet like Eurodisney or Audrey Tautou. The EU has no death penalty, but since Hussein is Muslim, the case could be transferred to its new Sharia division, & the trial moved to a Muslim country, possibly Sweden.
Posted by Jeff at May 4, 2005 12:34 AM
Comments
Uh-oh. I think you're about to have a John Hawkins problem.
Posted by: Daniel at May 3, 2005 11:19 PM
Ha! And all along I thought Sweden was suni. Speaking of freaks in Europe, I saw Amelie once. To say Audrey Tautou is weird is putting it mildly, but anything would be when compared with that flick.
As a related aside to Tautou I have to address this gem from the mcn link you posted:
"Roger Ebert called it a 'delicious pastry of a movie, a lighthearted fantasy in which a winsome heroine overcomes a sad childhood and grows up to bring cheer to the needful and joy to herself. You see it, and later when you think about it, you smile.'"
Yes, but a smile brought on by laughing at French filmmaking is not the same as being touched by its efforts.
Posted by: Martin @ b l o g.b a t at May 3, 2005 11:49 PM
Funny.
Posted by: torchpraise at May 4, 2005 05:41 AM
I was wondering why no one was coming to the aid or speaking for Army Pfc. Lynndie England. She pleaded guilty yesterday to prisoner abuse charges, and faces many years in prison.
She, with little education, no authority, and zero training as a prison guard, becomes the poster child for our depravity. While the authors of the American policy toward Iraqi detainees remain virtually untouched.
The authors are Gonzales (now U.S. attorney general), who drafted the policy; President Bush, who approved it; and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, who put it into effect.
If these guys are your heros I suggest you go find another comic book to read.
Nice, so much for supporting the troops.
jacob
Posted by: jacob at May 4, 2005 06:52 AM
Jacob,
As an active duty US Army NCO who has been to Iraq twice, I refuse to come to the defense of PFC England. She is an American Soldier. She attended the same use of force classes, Geneva convention familiarization, and Enemy Prisoner of War courses that every deploying Soldier is required to attend prior to deployment.
Yes, the chain of command was broken. Yes, more people in real authority need to be brought up on charges regarding this incident. But she was there, posing in the pictures and humiliating enemy prisoners. Soldiers.
As Americans, we are rightly or wrongly, held to a higher standard. When we act in such a manner, we lose credibility with the civillian population of the nation we are trying to help. Her actions, and the actions (or inactions) of the people in command, bring real discredit on the United States and the Army, which I have been proud to be associated with for 19 years.
Posted by: Dan at May 4, 2005 07:22 AM
Dan, I admire some of what you say but what legitimate investigation would point the finger (solely) at the troops.
It's like the one gunman theory (Kennedy) if that is what you want to find then you will succeed in finding the evidence to support your position.
I say again you have no farther to look than these guys:
The authors are Gonzales (now U.S. attorney general), who drafted the policy; President Bush, who approved it; and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, who put it into effect.
As Americans, we are rightly or wrongly, held to a higher standard.
I lament that this higher standard doesn't seem to apply to those mentioned.
jacob
Posted by: jacob at May 4, 2005 08:27 AM
Saying the President & Defense Secretary are responsible for the individual actions of soldiers is silly, & would make any war impossible to wage. If anyone should have been canned, it's the (female) general in charge of Abu Ghraib. But Abu Ghraib is a stark lesson to the world that in the American army, there is accountability. England isn't some fall-girl, she knew what she was doing.
(Note that none of these 'fire Rumsfield' types said a peep about Clinton & Wesley Clark's devastating high-altitude bombing of Serbia)
Posted by: beautifulatrocities
at May 4, 2005 08:58 AM
Amen, brother.
Posted by: Dan at May 4, 2005 09:08 AM
The tone of this discussion seems more suited to Little Green Footballs. I'd prefer more pictures of Muslim women in miniskirts acting in bad Turkish movies.
BTW, I just saw pictures of Attaturk's mausoleum. I admire anyone who could transform a calcified empire into a country that can make truly horrid movies where muslim women wear miniskirst (I think I'm obsessed) but I think that tomb is overdone. It makes King Mausolo's own and Emperor's Hadrian's, look tiny. Only Pharaoh's Khufus, is larger.
What is is about anatolians and huge tombs?
Posted by: John at May 4, 2005 09:08 AM
This satire is too close to the truth, and that is very sad.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at May 4, 2005 10:33 AM
He was a head of state, not some piece of gash
Ok...now a couple of coworkers just stood up to look over the cubiewalls wondering what the heck I'm hysterically laughing at.
o.my.
Posted by: Darleen at May 4, 2005 12:47 PM
"If these guys are your heros I suggest you go find another comic book to read."
Jacob, you aren't recommending we re-read the Clinton comic book are you? I think the adult book stores are only selling them used these days...
Posted by: Martin at Blogbat at May 4, 2005 02:58 PM
"The tone of this discussion seems more suited to Little Green Footballs."
I visit LGF a lot. Very serious folks, locked in eternal, near Dantesque struggle with islamo-fascists and moonbats, but so over-subscribed that a blog newbie like me can't post there, because registration is closed--permanently, it would seem. Aside from that, LGF is OK, though truly relentless in content.
I'm wondering what you meant by your comment. Essentially the same?
Posted by: Redhand
at May 4, 2005 03:12 PM
Redhand: LGF registration issometimes early in the morning for a couple of hours. Be vigilant & you can register
Posted by: beautifulatrocities
at May 4, 2005 03:19 PM
Nicely framed, Jeff. I especially like the remark about Sweden (Part of my ancestry is Danish and Norwegian and we didn't like the Swedes even before they became Humanist Muslimoids.
I have noticed,watching reruns of Sherlock Holmes mysteries, how much more human is the sense of justice that Victorian Sherlo and Doc Watson had. When they witnessed from hiding a blackmailed woman shoot her blackmailer and then leave the scene, they did not bother to call the cops because it seemed to them that justice had been done. He deserved it. But I guess that's just the cowboy in me (or the Victorian gentleman).
Spitting on Saddam seems mild. I myself would demur at plugging him up the choo-choo path. Ick. (And that's a very specific, not a generic Ick!).
Posted by: EssEm at May 4, 2005 03:40 PM
